Racially reverse the JENA SIX and guess what?

suppose there's some school where black kids hang around under a tree. suppose blacks keep white kids away from the tree. suppose some white kids complain, and black kids respond by playing anti-white rap music around the tree. suppose a gang of white youths corner a black kid and beat him to a pulp. suppose the black kid is knocked unconscious.

how would blacks, whites, and the national media have responded to this?

when we look at the Jena controversy, i agree that the white jury overreacted. but, does it make sense to turn those black thugs into heroes and martyrs? this is like saying that if a man beats up a woman and is excessively punished by the law, he is a hero and martyr. the man would be a victim of an over zealous prosecution, but would he be a good guy?
what is repulsive about the Jena affair is the black kids have been whitewashed into civil rights martyrs. outrageous.

would this have been the case had the 'Jena Six' been white and the assault victim black? suppose white kids attacked the black kid and were charged with attempted murder and convicted by an all black jury. would the media have cared? would white people have protested and marched? what would have been said by the likes of al sharpton and jesse jackson? they would have said the justice was served.
now, suppose the white kids had been charged fairly--for assault and battery--and been given fair punishment. how would blacks have reacted? i'll bet they would have marched on Jena complaining that the white kids were not punished enough. they would have screamed that the white kids had gotten away with attempted 'lynching'.

we can't properly understand this issue without looking at the underlying racial realities. white people are scared of black people. this is why even when blacks act crazy and beat up or kill whites with utter hatred, white people don't go marching into black neighborhoods. whites are afraid to go into a black community. but, blacks don't fear whites. and, so we have blacks marching into white communities with sharpton leading the charge.

and, there's much more to this issue than what the media give us. for instance, it's a fact that if a bunch of blacks monopolize a street, a corner, a tree, or a park, and defacto declare 'no honkeys allowed', whites will avoid it. if black students at a predominantly black school didn't allow non-blacks to come near a certain tree, no white kid would challenge this unwritten rule. also, whites generally don't wanna go where there are alot of blacks around anyway since blacks tend to be loud, rowdy, aggressive, and crazy.
so, if there's really social injustice, it's that when blacks take over a territory, they threaten and scare everyone else away.

look at howard beach and bensonhurst controversies in NY in the 1980s. though the violence was white-on-black, it was a defensive act on the part of whites when seen in the larger context. in all big cities, whites have been beaten, robbed, raped, and killed by blacks. so, whites just pick up their stuff and flee. so, whites have given up more and more territory to blacks. indeed, entire areas have been handed over completely to blacks. in many cities, there are bigger black areas than white areas. whites never venture into black neighborhoods; whites figure blacks are king there. so, in newly established white communities by white refugees from black madness, whites get awful defensive. white thinking is 'we don't go into your black neighborhood. if we do, we get beat up. but, you negroes not only come into our neighborhood but often come to make trouble'. this reality has been ignored by the national media. but, it's also been unstated by whites who don't wanna sound 'racist' and scared. it hurts white male pride to admit that they've been running from negroes. since whites cannot say they are afraid of negroes, they have no public rationale for not wanting to live with blacks. from the liberal viewpoint, whites are 'racist' for living in largely white areas whereas blacks are 'progressive' because they roam into white areas--for the sake of racial integration? but, this is to miss the point entirely. whites left integrated areas because stronger blacks have beaten up and threatened honkey. and, while many good black people wanna move into white areas for better schools and safer neighborhoods, many blacks wanna move into white areas only to make trouble. sometimes, good negroes come with bad negroes. a decent black family might move in but might invite relatives to move in who are not so nice. black parents might be nice but their kids may be into all that gangsta culture. and so on.

with the jena six issue, we saw all the arguments and initiative on the black side, and none on the white side. it was wrong for white kids to hang nooses, and it was wrong for the prosecution to be overzealous. but, there was no discussion of social or racial context--not even by whites or conservatives. just look at the stats. black on white violence is epidemic. also, no matter how you dice or slice it, a gang of black kids beat up a white kid, not vice versa. also, white kids tried to hold onto that tree because in an ever blackening and hostile environment--where most of the aggression was black--, white kids wanted a place where they can have some peace and quiet. these are poor small town whites. all they could 'afford' was a tree. meanwhile, all these sanctimonious white and jewish liberals who cry 'racism' have much better sanctuary trees--the highrise condos in the affluent parts of the cities where they never have to worry about black crime or aggression. how easy for some liberal millionaire jew living in the posh part of NY to condemn that small town white community. the liberal rich jew is in a position to talk the talk but never walk the walk. his tree is high up in the air in fancy urban area.
this doesn't mean that trees ought to be reserved to a single racial group in any school, and it certainly doesn't justify the actions of those white kids.
BUT, those white kids simply wanted a piece of turf to call their own, where they could have some peace and quiet from the hostile, nasty, and ugly behavior of blacks. these white kids don't have the money to move into nice big suburban mansions or fancy high rise condos as rich liberals do. they don't have the money to buy a second home in the hills of montana or the valleys of colorado like hollywood jews do. nor, can they fly off to the greek isles or to the bahamas where the only black folks that rich liberals encounter are those serving them. these white kids of jena have no money or privilege. the fact is more blacks are moving into town and causing more problems. the fact is in most physical altercations between black kids and white kids, white kids get whupped. this is the context in which white kids sought their own little spot. if black kids had picked their special spot, white kids would not have tried to move into it in fear of blacks. but, blacks don't fear whites. black guys see white guys as pussyass faggot-boys and see white girls as 'white pussy'. unless, we discuss these underlying issues, all this racial talk is bullshit.

by the way, wasn't there a crime case where a bunch of whites were raped, beaten, and murdered by black thugs some place in the south last year? yet, when white rights activists tried to bring attention to that, THEY were called 'racist' or 'race-baiters' by the liberal jewish run media. what white leaders ought to do is to designate the site of the crime as a holy site symbolizing black aggression and brutality against whites. and white people should make pilgrimages to that site and bring it under the media spotlight. and people should hold annual prayers there. and other gruesome sites of black-on-white violence should similarly be sanctified. black leaders have sanctified many sites where blacks were brutalized by whites in the past. since the 60s, the violence has been overwhelmingly black on white. i dare say blacks killed far more whites since the 60s than whites lynched blacks in all of the 20th century.